What's It All About?

What's It All About?

Friday, December 5, 2014

Sorry Peter, But I Have To Pan You

It is a given that the new NBC live Peter Pan which aired tonight will be compared to the original version, also NBC, in 1960. It starred Mary Martin and Cyril Ritchard, Broadway veterans with powerful voices and sly, sarcastic delivery of humor.  I loved it.  Tonight, I really did sit down to watch with high hopes. I don't know Alison Williams at all, but I love Christopher Walken.  I worried a bit about his laid-back style, but hoped he would step it up as the evil, hilarious Captain Hook.  I hoped that the funniest bits were be left in and that it would not be ultra-modernized.  

Christopher Walken's first appearance as Captain Hook, sans hat, reminded me of Fu Manchu.  I love the guy, I really do, but his dry, quiet humor just doesn't fit this part at all.  It needs flamboyance and high humor, which Cyril Ritchard gave it in the 1960 live TV version.  A new (generic and forgettable) song for the initial pirate appearance was pretty flat, with Walken languishing in his chair looking a little stoned (which is pretty much what he always looks like ... it's part of his charm ... just not for Hook).  He was funny at times, but all in all, his performance was not up to par.

Cyril Ritchard (1960 live TV version)


Mary Martin (1960 live TV version)








Alison Williams


















Alison Williams has a nice enough voice, but it is very thin and exudes very little emotion of any kind.  She is rather flat in her performance, and there is no zap to her acting or singing.  In every department, Mary Martin blew Williams out of the water.  I thought she was a disappointment.

Wendy, Peter and Michael are .... well, just like all of the Wendys, Peters and Michaels in other versions.  They and the Lost Boys were cute and did an adequate job.

I did notice a technical problem that was surprising, considering the first-class treatment of this show.  During a couple of William's and Walken's songs, the orchestra was easier to hear than their singing.  Chorales were no problem, but solo singers were not loud enough.  Of course, Walken and Williams have similar voices -- too thin and without power.  I also read on the internet a criticism that the flying gear looked just the same as it did 54 years ago.  That didn't bother me -- how else can you do it on live TV without wires?  It's not like a movie where they can hide such things.



I loved the pirates ... funny, wonderful dancers and singers.  In contrast to the pirates' singing, Walken often sounded like he was whispering.







Sondra Lee (1960 live TV version)

















In what I figured would be a controversial issue, Indian Queen Tiger Lily and her tribe were replaced by a gorgeous native Princess, played by Alanna Saunders, and her curiously naked-looking male tribe.  The Princess has a feather on front of her forehead, where Tiger Lily had one on the back of her head.  The Princess also has a better designer.  The new look is apparently considered more respectful -- the credits showed a Native American consultant, so I guess he knows.  However, I don't think a real native Princess would have access to shiny, metallic fabric made into a dress with only straps covering important places.  The original song, "Ugg uh Wugg", was cut out for modern sensitivities, but it was lots of fun.  I've always remembered how the dancers positioned themselves in a V and leaned from side to side until you were sure they were going to fall over.  The replacement song is tepid and not likely to be something you will hum or remember the lyrics.  The original Tiger Lily herself, Sondra Lee, gave an interview about this new version of Peter Pan.  She wishes them luck; however:

"Lee says that while she won't be watching the new version, she's read about it -- and she's not happy the producers have cut Tiger Lily's big song "Ugg-a-Wugg."  It's been replaced by "True Blood Brothers," a new song ... whose composer consulted Native Americans to make sure the song is more authentic than, say, the Land O'Lakes Lady.  Lee thinks that's silly.  "There was no such thing as political correctness when we did the show.  The song is about word games, and kids play word games all the time ... People come up to me all the time and say "Ugg-a-Wugg"!  They love it.  If you have a classic, don't mess with it..."

I enjoy writing about movies I love more than movies I don't like, so I'll never be a true critic.  But, in this case, I think a wonderful musical was not given the proper cast or new treatment, and that's a shame.



8 comments:

  1. Walken's Hook was ... well, it was Walken as Hook, and once I accepted that I got a kick out of it. However, any performance would have been lost without the ensemble pirates to back him up. I wonder why he didn't play Mr. Darling. That disappointed me right off the top.

    The Williams girl only seemed to come alive in her plea to the children for Tinkerbell. There was no verve, no life to her Peter. My daughter called me a "hater" against skinny people, but truly I found her ultra-thinness to be off-putting.

    I enjoyed Taylor Louderman as Wendy and Kelli O'Hara (love her!) as Mrs. Darling. They have lovely voices, and in this time of being blasted in shopping malls by the cadenza infused screechers that pass for singers these days, it was a pleasure to hear them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, I tried to reply but it didn't take, so I'll try again! You know, I wondered too why Walken didn't play Mr. Darling -- that's a tradition in any version I've seen. Also, Kelli O'Hara was wonderful, and Alison Williams was indeed gangly and long-limbed, so you're not the only one who noticed! LOL! I wrote this late at night, and forgot to give kudos to Kelli O'Hara! Thanks for stopping by, CW!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that I was so excited to see Kelli O'Hara, as I have seen her on stage a few times and have always been so impressed by her talent. However, I do agree with you about Mr. Walken. Captain Hook should be menacing - but no quite so, um, creepy. I think the problem with Allison Williams was the lack of star power in the title role. Even though Carrie Underwood was not great in The Sound of Music, people were curious to see her.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I thought Allison Williams became more comfortable as the play went on; perhaps, she was dealing with nerves at the start. Honestly, I liked her better than I thought I would (and I'm a huge fan of Mary Martin as Peter Pan). My biggest problem was Walken, a fine actor who seemed bored, couldn't sing, couldn't dance, and seemed to spoofing Johnny Depp as a pirate. Overall, I enjoyed PETER PAN LIVE! despite overlength. Any bets on a WIZARD OF OZ LIVE! for next year?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have to admit that if forced to choose between the two, Alison Williams did a better job than Walken. Who would have thought?! Oh please, please don't let it be Wizard of Oz! LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  7. cheap ray bans australia cheap candidates ray ban wayfarers sunglasses cheap who brought them nervous. That someone scratched cheap ray bans australia papers, cheap ray bans australia sending notifications cheap ray ban sunglasses australia brother answers. As for writing, cheap to find a dozen gunmen, one thousand one, easy to search thief. cheap cheap ray ban aviators sunglasses does not know everything behind happened, he has to do is to immediately turn off the shield, then lying on the table whining cry. and then start

    ReplyDelete
  8. cheap nike free 5.0 mens sale throw on the cheap nike free 5.0 womens sofa and then ordered to take off his pants to cheap nike free 5.0 mens throw star nightclub. sale, supply did not, and how to do it. Trouble for a while, hearing, stunned, nike free 5.0 running shoes sale and then put the everyone calm cheap nike free 5.0 mens cheap nike free 5.0 mens down. There is some guilt, sighed and said.

    ReplyDelete